Power, for Marx, was in the hands of the capitalists, while for Durkheim it was in social facts, and for Weber in rationality. However, interpreters of Foucault press that he furthered his scholarship when he broke away from the philosophy of his predecessors, especially with his understanding of power. Peter, by Pietro Perugino, 1481, via the Sistine Chapel, Rome He was intent on reinforcing that there was, indeed, a darker side to the Enlightenment.Ĭhrist Giving the Keys to St. Foucault further substantiated his predecessors’ predictions. However, philosophers like Marx, Durkheim, and Weber were concerned that the Enlightenment had a darker underbelly: that great structures of oppression, control, discipline and surveillance would see the light of day because of it. An optimism accompanied the Enlightenment’s success. The Enlightenment streamlined rationality into conventional philosophical thought, paving the way for greater progress, development, and in many ways, emancipation. Foucault on Power: Departing from Contemporary Philosophy Michel Foucault, by Martine Franck, in Foucault’s house, Ile de France, 1978, via
0 Comments
It now emerges as a strikingly ambivalent account of decolonization. For the book’s sixtieth anniversary, it has been reissued, by Grove, with a new introduction by Cornel West and a previously published one by Homi K. Sartre’s celebrity brought Fanon’s work widespread attention but also colored its initial Western reception. Fanon, who had spent years in Algeria agitating for its liberation, was, at the time of the book’s publication, little known and dying from leukemia. Sartre wrote these incendiary words in a preface to “ The Wretched of the Earth,” an anti-colonial treatise by the French and West Indian political philosopher and psychiatrist Frantz Fanon. After all, such a killing eliminates “in one go oppressor and oppressed: leaving one man dead and the other man free.” Sartre, despised in France for his solidarity with Algerian anti-colonialists, wanted to goad people into seeing the “strip-tease of our humanism.” He wrote, “You who are so liberal, so humane, who take the love of culture to the point of affectation, you pretend to forget that you have colonies where massacres are committed in your name.” “Killing a European is killing two birds with one stone,” Jean-Paul Sartre wrote in 1961, seven years into France’s brutal suppression of the Algerian independence movement. When Brian is finally rescued after fifty-four days in the wild, he emerges from his ordeal with new patience and maturity, and a greater understanding of himself and his parents. He is alone in the Canadian wilderness with nothing but his clothing, a tattered windbreaker, and the hatchet his mother had given him as a present.Īt first consumed by despair and self-pity, Brian slowly learns survival skills-how to make a shelter for himself, how to hunt and fish and forage for food, how to make a fire-and even finds the courage to start over from scratch when a tornado ravages his campsite. When the plane crashes, killing the pilot, the sole survivor is Brian. Pages: 144 pages(Story Hatchet 137 pages, Glossary 7 pages) Genre: An adventure story and also a psychological novel. In it Brian learns how to survive and his many adventures as he. Thirteen-year-old Brian Robeson, haunted by his secret knowledge of his mother’s infidelity, is traveling by single-engine plane to visit his father for the first time since the divorce. Hatchet is the story of a young mans survival in the Canadian wilderness after a plane crash. Hatchet has also been nominated as one of America’s best-loved novels by PBS’s The Great American Read. This award-winning contemporary classic is the survival story with which all others are compared-and a page-turning, heart-stopping adventure, recipient of the Newbery Honor. |